Posts Tagged ‘symbian’

The “Symbian Guru” chooses Android

July 1st, 2010

If I wake up with a headache and it wasn’t the result of drinking the night before, I feel like it was given to me for some cosmic reason. Sort of like Daphne in this early episode of Frasier I happened to catch the other day…she got these psychic headaches whenever somebody nasty was nearby. (In that episode it was Lillith, but I digress.) I feel like there are greater forces at work that are making me take things slow on mornings that I wake up with brain fuzz.

So I woke up with a ripper this morning, and I came downstairs to see that Symbian Guru has abandoned Symbian for Android. Because my head was throbbing, I lingered on this blog entry a bit longer than I normally would, and I realized it was because I had to say something besides “welcome to the platform*.”

I have watched with excitement as my friends and family one by one switch to Android. My brother got the EVO 4G yesterday, my Sister-in-law got the Backflip two weeks ago. My girlfriend, who is terrible at remembering names, has repeatedly brought up the HTC Aria, asking about it and recalling the advertisements shown during the early World Cup 2010 games.

This is not about building a community any more. With 160,000 Android devices being sold per day, this is about being at the right place at the right time.

Ricky says this in his Symbian-Guru farewell post:

While European carriers stumble over themselves to carry the latest Nokia devices, American carriers tend to pick up the lame-duck and low-end versions of Nokia’s phones. This is improving, but at a snail’s pace. Both Symbian and Nokia are dying brands in the U.S., if not already dead, and I’m sick and tired of banging the gong alone.

I spent much of my last month in Europe taking pictures of billboards, noting TV advertisements, and comparing displays in mobile phone shops, and I can say this: Nokia and Sony Ericsson still rule Europe. But HTC is making a huge push there. When I drove into Prague on the 611, I passed by the biggest HTC Android advert I had ever seen plastered on the side of a warehouse. It must have been a football field long.

Furthermore, because of Sony Ericsson and Samsung’s support of Android, the platform is gaining a lot of recognition over there. In the newsstands in Munich, publications like Mobile Zeit and Mobile News all had the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 prominently featured on the cover. It was in display windows all over the place, and there were advertisements for it on walls, on TV, and on the radio.

I keep telling Americans that Sony Ericsson is going to break Android through to the European market, but I don’t know if anyone believes me.

But back to the abandonment of Symbian. With the new top-of-the-line Nokia N8 rocking the first version of Symbian^3 on the way, you’d think that a Symbian enthusiast would be all over it. But Ricky totally nails it:

When the Nokia N8 was first announced, I was dead convinced I would purchase one out of my own pocket. I started putting money aside, ready to even pre-order the N8 as soon as I could. However, the more I use the Nokia N97 as my primary device, the less I’ve been convinced that the N8 is going to be better. Time and time again, Nokia’s high-end smartphones have arrived with pathetic processors, stingy amounts of RAM, and small batteries – why should I put up another $500 of my own money ‘just to see’?

When I reported about the N8 on Betanews, I talked to Nokia about the device’s 680Mhz processor, noting that their absolute top of the line device has a processor only as fast as the current generation of mid-range Android phones.

They said “there are optional ways to achieve great performance” outside of raw processing capabilities.

It kind of upset me that they’d put a freaking 12 megapixel camera into the device, but chose to rely on “options” to deliver a screaming user experience. It just reminded me of the people who put stripped-down Linux distributions on old machines and claim they run just as fast as newer, more powerful machines.

They may be efficient, but why should efficiency only be employed when it’s a necessity?

But I digress. This is not proclaiming the death of Symbian in any way or naming winners and losers in the mobile world. This is just another reminder that one by one, people important to other mobile platforms are becoming Androids.

Android is not perfect. But no technology is, and that’s part of why it’s such a wonderful and exciting field. You get familiar with the limitations of your hardware or software and delight in the workarounds you devise. You learn their strengths and exploit the hell out of them.

That’s what technology is all about, that’s what Android is all about for me.

*Welcome to the platform, by the way.

A thought-provoking view of Android from Symbian

October 24th, 2009

GigaOM struck gold with a video of Symbian’s Lee Williams criticizing Google for poisoning the well with its Android business model. It’s an absolute must-watch.
Here’s the meat of it, taken as a direct quote:

“First and foremost, the goal of a Google system would be to create a situation where you have information about the user and the use of…those cloud apps that are proprietary to Google. Secondarily, it would be to cookie them, so you get that unique identifier association with the data you’ve collected on the individual’s habits and routines, etc, so you can target apps toward them, so you can build more intelligent cloud-based apps for them and so forth. At the end of the day, what is the motivation for any other company in an Android ecosystem when in fact the consumers are being taken right away from them just in some of these simple concepts?”

“Android is building almost the perfect storm of fragmentation in a large marketplace, I don’t know how many different UIs are shipping and how many people claim to own them across the 18 devices in development. More than that, they continue to do the revenue share deals with the operators and leverage the benefit of these cookied consumers…how many different UIs and closed APIs you’re gonna end up with in that scenario becomes a very big question on how do you sustain and return on investments in that type of environment?”

“I don’t hate Android at all, I think it’s a great initiative. But what I think Google should do is come be a member of the Symbian Foundation and join a truly open ecosystem where anybody can come and sit on a council seat and determine the future of that system, instead of advertising that they have one and going in their own direction.”

…I stripped out the part where he calls Apple greedy and Google evil. That was a bit of a “sweeps week” comment, but Williams’ comment is nonetheless very interesting because he’s cutting Google down for building an open ecosystem that has a closed monetization scheme.

Then, talking about his relationship with handset makers like Samsung, HTC and Motorola, Williams said companies have come to him and said “…One of the issues I’ve got is that Google is taking my interface with my consumers away.”

Let’s see if I have this right…Google gives you the open source framework and shares the revenue and all it costs you is the user’s behavioral data? And in exchange, users get high-quality services for free?

What’s the problem, exactly?

I’m sure my view is oversimplifying it, and my knowledge of Symbian’s inner workings is poor. However, I do know that it’s very easy for a nonprofit organization to vilify a group that is working for profit as “greedy” or “evil,” especially when their customers are the exact same companies.

I guess that’s why he extended the invitation to join the foundation instead of a big old fuck off.

It’s all gravy from here on out

October 7th, 2009

It’s only Wednesday but it’s already been a huge week for Android.

Verizon’s on board with its first Android device in the next couple of weeks, and Eric Schmidt slathered praise all over Verizon like barbecue sauce on a chicken wing. I quote: “It’s absolutely a fact that Verizon’s data network is the best in the US by far, and I’m not talking ten percent here, I’m talking about many multiples.”

Now the rumors are flying that AT&T is coming out with its first Android device, and not just any device, but the Dell Dork Phone I (aka the Mini 3i) that I talked about a few weeks ago. To be honest, my interest in that was only half-hearted and if I don’t get my hands on one, it’s going to lose out to something much more concrete like the freakin’ 800 MHz Samsung Moment.

What are we looking at, then?

Pretty much what we all expected, right? It’s not world domination or anything, but Android this week stepped onto the threshold of being a viable, multi-handset option on all carriers.

Meanwhile, Gartner is predicting that Android will have a market share only exceeded by Symbian by 2012. 14.5% or roughly 72 million phones per year. That would cut Symbian down to 39% and iPhone down to 13%, Blackberry would stay at 12.8% and Windows Mobile to 12.5%.

From inception to the number 2 in the world in four years.

Let’s see how long it took Symbian…well, its roots go back pretty damn far. Let’s start at the Psion Series 5 EPOC 32 days in 1997, which turned into Symbian in 1998. It wasn’t until 2004 that it began moving like crazy. So roughly six years from birth to the top?

So maybe 2014 for Android to take the #1 spot? Heh…maybe, but it’s late and I have a headache.

Live Streaming TV hits Android

August 28th, 2009

Today, a $9.95 streaming TV app hit the Android Market that has seriously blown me away.

SPB TV 1.0 has got a whole bunch of channels (the press release today says 100+ in 20+ languages,) an awesome interface, an integrated programming guide, picture-in-picture and the ability to set calendar reminders for upcoming shows.

Screenshot from SPB TV

Screenshot from SPB TV

I don’t generally seek out live streams of anything. Like I’ve said in prior posts, I listen to Web radio and stuff (the DroidLive ShoutCast client is great, by the way) but I’m much more a fan of on-demand streaming.

However, SPB TV has really grabbed me. It’s that slick.

The app has been around already on Windows Mobile 6 and Symbian S60 3rd ed. On those platforms, however, the app is much larger and slightly more expensive: 5MB and $14.95…the Android app is only .6MB and $9.95. Either it’s missing some of the functionality of the other platforms, or we’ve got ourselves a fantastic little app here. (We’ve also gotten it before iPhone…but that’s not so surprising, right?)

I’m actually going to go watch it a bit more, and I’ll update this post with further assessments. Right now I’m giving this a tentative “buy” rating even though i’m not totally sure I’ll ever actually use it.

I may just be enamored that it looks so good and actually kind of works.