Archive for August, 2009

Do not compare the Android Market to the iTunes App Store on my watch.

August 31st, 2009

Read this article and then hit “Back.” I’ll wait.

….

Welcome back. I know that is just the stupidest way to start a blog entry, but you’ll have to forgive me, I was a bit irked at that article. It is supposed to be a suggestion to Google, I guess, because it does end on a favorable note. But seriously, there was one thing that upset me about it:

Larva’s Matt Hall attributes this poor performance in part to Android’s shoddy App purchase flow. Unlike the iPhone’s integrated App Store, Android Market doesn’t have screenshots of apps, forces you into the browser at times, makes you use Google Checkout, has some unintuitive navigation issues, and a handful of other problems. These issues are widely known — you’d be hard pressed to find anyone who thinks the purchase process is as smooth as it is on the iPhone — but they’ve been around for quite a while.

What’s wrong with Google Checkout? It has improved a ton in the three years it’s existed, and comparing a fully functional multi-way transaction system with a simple dedicated merchant site is just silly. You can tie in Google Checkout with your Adsense/Adwords account, you can use it to sell shit online. iTunes is just a money hole..real tough to get right in six years.

Furthermore, the Android Market does not really exist anywhere that’s visible on a non-phone platform. Yeah, there’s the site, but that’s not at all what the market really looks like. The iPhone app store has iTunes, which extends the App Store’s sphere of influence into the desktop OS realm.

Also…I don’t know if you’ve ever spent a great deal of time shopping for apps directly on an iPhone, but if you pick up your iPhone or iPod right now and look at an app’s dedicated site…just pick one at random, it doesn’t matter.

Okay, what’s missing from the first page that is FRONT AND CENTER in the Android Market?

User reviews.

And you wonder why this developer sold more in the iTunes App Store? People are sold by the description and the screenshots. They have to click over to another page to read user reviews. The Android Market, meanwhile has user reviews right up front…however nescient they may be. Developers have to deal with the idiot masses right out of the gate, people who wouldn’t know open source from a third degree burn.

Actual front page review of Larva Labs’ Retro Defence: “Good, but not worth $5.00″

Look around elsewhere. Notice that customer reviews are almost always put at the bottom or on other pages? No wonder you’re not selling as much as you could.

And as for “unintuitive navigation features” that this guy is talking about, I have no idea. I’ve never found myself wildly floundering for direction in the Android Market. Games and Productivity apps are separate. You can see them by popularity or by date uploaded…click on the one you want to look at and then click “buy” then hit “ok.” It’s not fucking celtic runes, get over it.

I absolutely agree that the Android Market is not perfect. The first thing I’d change is the white on black color scheme*. No sites designed for consumption on a phone should do that, it makes the screen reflective and harder to read (see: Mirror app.) I also agree that screenshots are needed to entice buyers.

But criticizing it for Google Checkout is completely dumb. iTunes is not a bank, PayPal is not a bank, so they’re all about equally vulnerable. I won’t even get started about basing an assessment of the Android Market’s prosperity on the FIFTH PLACE company. You can’t base ANYTHING on that. At least if we contacted the top seller, you could set a ceiling. Come on.

You can’t tell me how long a race lasted by the fifth and twelfth place contestants. You can’t even tell me if it was good.

Black-on-White Android Market

Black-on-White Android Market


*According to CNet today, this is already in the works.

Keeping the download spending in check

August 30th, 2009

I’m out of control.

I may open the first chapter of downloaders anonymous or something

Every day, I find myself dropping money in the Playstation Network, WiiWare, DSiWare, iTunes, Amazon (MP3, Video on Demand, Kindle), and of course, our beloved Android Market. So a time comes at the end of every month when I start pondering my downloads much more seriously and consider cutting back my spending.

I also start appreciating free services much more.

So since it’s the end of the month, and there’s been a ton of press about Google Books, and since I’m a Kindle user, all the forces have been pushing me to play with it.

Google Books has over a million free public domain books in PDF and ePUB formats, which is absolutely fantastic if you use any of the non-Kindle e-readers. If you use the Kindle, though, you’re pretty much screwed. You have to pay $1.09 for Amazon to convert each free .PDF file to an .AZW file. The recent addition of ePub just means there’s another format unsupported on the Kindle. I tried out the conversion to see what happens, and Amazon’s conversion rendered my “free” Google Books sideways. What a complete shamfuck!

Nope, Amazon does not render Google Books right!

Nope, Amazon does not render Google Books right!

Luckily, Google Books has been formatted as a mobile Web page for Android and iPhone, so I can still access the stuff for free if I’m really in need of a fix for classic literature. Though it’s not a dedicated app or anything, it’s still cool that it’s a fallback for Kindle users who are fortunate enough to have a high-quality mobile Webkit browser.

Google renders each book into chunks. The ones I checked out put nine book pages on a single mobile web site, and the text was formatted to an agreeable size. Instead of turning pages like you would on an e-reader, you just drag your finger up the page until you hit the bottom. Then you hit “next page,” and there you have it. I haven’t been able to get it to work without a Wi-Fi connection, though, so that is kind of a bitch.

However, you can get a free reader app like FBReader which lets you read ePub, download the books off of the Google page, and you’re pretty much set for reading even without a connection. I do wish there was a Kindle app for Android like there is for the iPhone, because I have zero intentions of reading a full book on my phone…the Kindle sync feature is really crucial. I’ve been trying to read Chuck Palahniuk’s Pygmy for like a month and it keeps giving me trouble. If you’ve read it, you know why. If not, I suggest you do. It’s real linguistic fun. If I had the ability to drag it over to my phone for some opportunistic reading, I would have been done by now.

Of course, if I finished that book sooner, I’d have bought more books and be that much poorer.

Live Streaming TV hits Android

August 28th, 2009

Today, a $9.95 streaming TV app hit the Android Market that has seriously blown me away.

SPB TV 1.0 has got a whole bunch of channels (the press release today says 100+ in 20+ languages,) an awesome interface, an integrated programming guide, picture-in-picture and the ability to set calendar reminders for upcoming shows.

Screenshot from SPB TV

Screenshot from SPB TV

I don’t generally seek out live streams of anything. Like I’ve said in prior posts, I listen to Web radio and stuff (the DroidLive ShoutCast client is great, by the way) but I’m much more a fan of on-demand streaming.

However, SPB TV has really grabbed me. It’s that slick.

The app has been around already on Windows Mobile 6 and Symbian S60 3rd ed. On those platforms, however, the app is much larger and slightly more expensive: 5MB and $14.95…the Android app is only .6MB and $9.95. Either it’s missing some of the functionality of the other platforms, or we’ve got ourselves a fantastic little app here. (We’ve also gotten it before iPhone…but that’s not so surprising, right?)

I’m actually going to go watch it a bit more, and I’ll update this post with further assessments. Right now I’m giving this a tentative “buy” rating even though i’m not totally sure I’ll ever actually use it.

I may just be enamored that it looks so good and actually kind of works.

AT&T, the Anti-Android (Aka “Fun with Pie Charts”)

August 28th, 2009

MKM Partners analyst Tero Kuittinen told The Street yesterday that AT&T ditched its plans to carry a Motorola Android phone, referring to the HTC Heron which Motorola originally designed to be a Windows Mobile phone, and then reportedly retracted at the last minute to load up with Android instead.

A lot of pundits have put a lot of weight behind Motorola’s first two Android handsets, saying that this is the company’s “last chance” to recover its phone-producing arm, or some sort of swan song because of the spin-off that was supposed to take place in the third quarter of 2009.

Last October, Co-CEO Sanjay Jha said “While our strategic intent to separate the company remains intact, we are no longer targeting the third quarter of 2009, primarily due to the macro-economic environment, stresses in the financial markets and the changes underway in Mobile Devices.”

Not having support from AT&T is a big detriment, some say, as it’s the only carrier consistently stealing subscribers away from other carriers.

But wait, AT&T didn’t just cock-block Motorola. It’s actually given the big thumbs down to TWO companies offering an Android device. Apparently it pitched HTC’s Lancaster into the dumpster this summer as well, only that time, we don’t know exactly why. Rumors were that it could have been too underpowered or perhaps even too problematic for a successful launch.

Because AT&T is the exclusive iPhone carrier, people often forget that it offers any other smartphones. Maybe they don’t consider any other products noteworthy, I don’t know. But the point is, AT&T’s selection of smartphones is led by Windows Mobile. Check this out:

AT&T's smartphone roster by OS

AT&T's smartphone roster by OS

If you look at these stats as a direct reflection of the U.S. smartphone market as a whole, you’ll notice right away that the OS distribution is kind of out of whack. Yes, AT&T has 70 million subscribers, and that’s an important factor in the availability of an OS…but how much does it really determine market position?

I mean, does Windows Mobile have the lion’s share of the domestic smartphone market because it is the most common OS in AT&T’s smartphones? Of course not: Blackberry does, then iPhone, THEN Windows Mobile.

Let’s assume that on September 10th, T-Mobile and Verizon get Motorola Android phones, and lets see how their charts look.

Here are our friends over at T-Mobile. We know those zany Germans love Android (they got the Samsung Galaxy before anyone else, after all.) However, we see that Android happens to be T-Mobile’s ONLY smartphone OS that isn’t Windows Mobile or Blackberry. It’s probably because they’re too busy gunking up their phone lineup with those silly Sidekicks.

T-Mobile's smartphone OS distribution

T-Mobile's smartphone OS distribution

And here’s Verizon. As you can see, they’re the most balanced/least diverse smartphone carrier in our list thus far.

Verizon's Smartphones if they get Motorola Sholes

Verizon's Smartphones if they get Motorola Sholes

AT&T already offers the most diverse selection of Smartphones, at least by operating system…so maybe it’s not trying to thin the proverbial broth by adding any old mediocre Android device to the pool.

Now, you’re probably going to say “Hold up a second, fancy pants! Where’s the Palm Centro in all this?”

I know right? Check Sprint, they’re the only carrier still offering Palm’s (awesome) gear as of this very moment. While we’re looking at them, you’ll notice that Sprint’s got quite a diverse OS lineup…but that diversity is mostly due to Palm’s multi-platform delivery.

No Android here...yet.

No Android here...yet.

So yes…my point. The carriers we expect to have Android on them also happen to be the ones with the least diverse smartphone selection.

I know there’s only a correlative link between number of OSes and likelihood of new OS adoption (and not a causal one,) so don’t bite my face off for pointing it out.

Poking around with Electrum Drum Synth

August 25th, 2009

Because I spent many years as a poor musician, my area of gear expertise isn’t with high quality instruments, it’s with bargain equipment (think Zoom, M-Audio, Casio, et al.), pawn shop finds, and things best classified as “musical toys.”

I keep up with the latest toy musical instruments, and delight in their exploitation. Circuit bending brightens my day, and I’m always looking out for the next Stylophone. I got the Korg DS-10 on the day it came out, I have two copies of Traxxpad for PSP, and I consider the iPhone/iPod Touch to be a full-fledged music platform.

I guess i’m a pretty discerning customer in the “Don’t Expect Much” category.

Electrum was made by Niko Twenty and is available for $3.99 in the Android Market. What you get is a 16-step sequencer somewhat like the ol’ TR-808 in design, and each sequence is built with six samples. You can put together up to 32 different sequences and create full songs. The cool part is that you can export your creations as single sequence loops or as a full song. The dumps are 16 bit wav files (mono).

A blurry, late night shot of Electrum's interface

A blurry, late night shot of Electrum's interface

I had originally intended to put in a couple of quick sequences that I whipped up on the “rock kit,” but I’m having some trouble doing that, so I’ll just say that there’s also 808, 909, Orchestral, Hip Hop, and Human Beatbox kits and 6 free downloadable packs. While it’s pretty light on features, the only thing it’s really lacking is the ability to import your own sample set. (See Comments)  I always find myself wishing for a sound recording sampler app so I can make my own Richard James kit of nutty noise captured on the phone’s mic. But I guess I have to wait.

If you’ve ever used BeatMaker on iPhone, don’t expect that level of quality. However, BeatMaker costs 20 fricking dollars and Electrum costs only 4. At one fifth the price of BeatMaker, you get much more than one fifth of the functionality with Electrum. Complaints are few. It does get crashy at times, it has dumped some broken .wavs for some reason, and the UI in Sequence mode looks like it’s unfinished. But it’s a work in progress and junk musicians should applaud Niko Twenty.

This is definitely one of the best music apps we have on the Android Platform, and I’m currently working on a little jam built with beats from BeatMaker, a guitar track from Ubisoft’s Jam Sessions for Nintendo DS, and some Theremin wangling from Bebot on iPhone.

Subscription music on Android…soon.

August 24th, 2009

Rhapsody for iPhone is going to remain a big deal until it gets approved or rejected. That’s like half the damn fun with the iTunes App store lately. But nestled in Real’s press release this morning was the mention of a Rhapsody app for Android. I’m sure I won’t be the first person on the Internet to say thank Christ.

The music industry loves subscription services like children love things that scare the shit out of them, and if we can have streaming subscription services to our mobile devices, that’s practically a reinvention of radio, and that’s how the Fuckedcompany that is the music industry will come back.

You can also think of these services as “music utility companies,” which may be upsetting to some of you…but probably not to musicians and record labels. Some people think it’s going to happen to news, too. Shit, News Corp. already said they’re going to start charging for all of their news sites…but I have digressed enough.

I don’t love Rhapsody. In fact, I fucking hate Rhapsody. I went to their download shop launch event in NYC with Ben Gibbard (guy from Death Cab for Cutie/Postal Service) and their people were literally nowhere to be found…presumably they were already drinking and watching the show. I had exactly ONE drink before they ended open bar and I had to listen to shitty acoustic versions of shitty Postal Service songs that I hated eight years ago. Then after the show ended, everyone milled around and socialized and I had no idea who I was supposed to meet with because it was so dark and loud and half the crowd was leaving.

I realize that has nothing to do with the service whatsoever, so I’m going to shift things and say when they release their Android App, I’ll give them a fair shake.

But I subscribe to Napster. I joined up for a Betanews review, figuring it was $5 and not a big deal, and I’ve stayed with it since then. It’s probably been almost five months. It’s not great, but it’s proven useful…and if they released an Android app, I’d be pretty happy.

I talked to them today, and they said that they are “looking into making the service available in as many places as possible, including the iPhone,” but they didn’t mention Android. They said they’d keep me posted. Until then, i’ll just have to completely obliterate my battery listening to StreamFurious and consuming “traditional” radio.

Android Rule #1: All Apps made by Google are must haves.

August 20th, 2009

It took me a while to get into podcasts…like very long…like I had an iPod for 3 years before I even considered checking any out.  And this is coming from a guy who runs errands on Saturday mornings just so he can listen to Car Talk, Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me, and This American Life in close succession.  This is coming from a guy who would subject his bandmates to old tapes of Johnny Dollar and Nero Wolfe when on tour.

So, long story short, it took me a while, but I eventually learned that I love podcasts.  However, using mp3 players without their own wireless connection kind of makes the acquisition of podcasts a little bit tiresome…especially if you don’t use iTunes. So being able to get them wirelessly as soon as they come out is probably one of my top five favorite media conveniences.  It’s definitely up there with Kindle whispernet shopping and Netflix Instant streaming.  (I’ll think of a couple more later.)
play_screen_2
I used DoggCatcher for a while when the app was still pretty new, but it really sucked the battery,  sucked up resources, the interface was crap, and there was no easy method of content discovery.   On top of all that, they started charging for the full version.   It was at that point that I uninstalled it.  I haven’t had a podcatcher on my phone since then.

check that out!

check that out!


So I’m stoked on Google Listen, the new Android-exclusive podcatching app in Google Labs. Like most of Google’s stuff, it’s simple and straightforward. You search for podcasts you already know, download them, subscribe to them, or stream them instantly. On 3G you can get a good chunk of a podcast listened to, but once you hit the spot where it would normally pause to buffer, it actually starts all the way over again and you can’t jump back to where you were interrupted. It’s an annoyance, but they’ll fix it…they’re Google.

You can also discover new content by browsing through recent and most popular searches, or by entering topical search terms. For example, if you don’t know exactly which show you want to listen to, but you want it to be about some current event, just type in the event or the date. It’s a good use of search. I suppose it may actually be more a search tool than a podcatcher, but I haven’t decided yet. I have only been using it for one day.

Like the title of this post says, if it’s made by Google, even as a Lab, you can expect a certain degree of awesomeness.

Scan this to download Google Listen!

Scan this to download Google Listen!

Humorously, In the Listen FAQ, it asks: “Will Listen work on my iPhone, Palm Pre, or Newton?”

Jokes.

Android gets an Antivirus suite…I know you care.

August 20th, 2009

I’m skeptical about mobile security, and I’ll probably remain so until I get heinously infected with some malware that requires an OS reinstall…which, as far as I know, is really fucking annoying on a phone.

A few months ago, I wrote about how security providers are always running up and telling us that we’re gravely in danger, and how you sort of become numb to it. Of course you’re telling me I need Antivirus on my phone, it’s the product you’re known for making. I mean, do I look to the umbrella salesman for weather updates?

But ultimately, a compromised phone could be way more than just an annoyance. Someone could steal all your info, way beyond the stuff that the bank and phone company can protect. Think about that whole thread of sexts with that married person you had that little “thing” with, or all your calendar data listing when your kid is at a baby sitter…it’s fodder for humiliation or even worse, extortion. Or, your phone could be a part of a mobile botnet used to bring down Twitter for the forty millionth time this year. THAT WOULD BE TRAGIC!

But enough terror husbandry*, we’ve got phone stuff to talk about.

This week, DroidSecurity unveiled their $4.99 Internet Security Suite…a product it’s billing as “the first full-featured consumer anti-malware and physical security app for Google’s Android operating system.”

They also have this little bad ass as a logo...though I don't know why the Sheriff would have a bandit mask on.

I don't know why the Sheriff would have a bandit mask on.

It comes with several components: VirusFree and VirusFree Pro for cleaning up malware, viruses and junk SMS, CheckMate, your average profile-based malware database, and FindR, a tool for tracking lost or stolen phones with the ability to run a remote memory wipe.

For some reason, all these components are listed separately on the DroidSecurity site, and FindR is listed as costing $20….I looked at that and was like “yeah..sure,” until I checked further and the whole thing is, in fact only $4.99. It’s a reasonable price if you’re genuinely afraid of having your phone compromised or if you want to have a remote killswitch for your device in case its stolen and your SD card happens to have several dozen naked pictures of yourself.

I saved my $4.99, though….well…not true. I saved $2.00 of it because I actually bought the Electrum Drum machine instead. That’s just me though, I’ll let you know how that goes later.

*NOTE: I intentionally avoid the term “FUD,” as I loathe it. As you read this blog, you’ll become acquainted with the many, many terms that I hate. Usually, they’re cliches, abbreviations, and convenient expressions that replace linguistic invention. Hence, my advocacy of the neologism “Sext.”)

How I really feel about my antiquated G1

August 18th, 2009

…So the G1 may not be updated beyond Cupcake (Android 1.5)…

As an Android early adopter, I do not feel screwed.  Do I care that I shelled out all that money for the G1 just to watch it get put out to pasture in less than a year?  Nope.  I can’t imagine that any other G1 owner would really be that upset either.

Know why?

Because we didn’t want the G1 when we bought it.  We wanted the first Android phone.  We wanted the first Google phone, and we got both of those things.  If anything, the G1/Dream actually made the whole experience worse for a lot of people.

Don’t get me wrong.  I love the phone, I really do, and I am now painfully attached to the keyboard/trackball layout.  But overall it’s janky and I now have a legitimate reason to shop for a new phone.  The first one on my list is the Motorola Sholes simply because it has a keyboard and there more Android devices without one.

I understand that a physical keyboard lends to a phone’s overall creakiness, and the iPhone is therefore built like a goddamn rock.   My G1, on the other hand, cracked to shit when I dropped it once and it feels all wobbly most of the time.   But I simply do not wish to sacrifice the already tiny screen real estate (and use a soft keyboard)  for the sake of a stronger chassis.

I mean, are you nuts?   People and their virtual keyboards, man.  How fucking small of a screen do you want?

Your virtual keyboard cuts the workspace down to 1 inch. Good Job.

Your virtual keyboard cuts the workspace down to 1 inch. Good Job.

Knowing this, how can you honestly consider an onscreen keyboard a viable interface?  Couldn’t they have come up with some kind of stupid gesture-related “handwriting recognition” alphabet like the old Palm Pilots used to have?  I mean,  ONE INCH OF WORKSPACE….your screen is about this big:

This doesn't look so awesome for running apps.

This doesn't look so awesome for running apps.

Now I know these two devices end up having the same real estate because I have both of them and I measured.  The LG eNV is actually a o.9″ so I rounded up, and the iPhone’s screen space in notepad and messaging was 1.1″  so I rounded down.

I know Motorola hasn’t had a killer phone since the RAZR, but I’m putting a lot of stock in the Sholes, since it’s one of the only Android Phones in the near term that has a keyboard.

Holgadroid

August 17th, 2009

There are two stereotypical gear snobs whom I cannot suffer listening to: photo snobs and audiophiles.  Therefore, I absolutely love when snobby low-tech trends get blown up and turned into cheap gimmicks that any 12 year-old can reproduce on a high tech device.

One of these trends from a few years ago was the plastic lens Holga camera. It creates these spacy, blurry and quite aesthetically pleasing photos. Just check out the Toy Camera Pool on Flickr to see what i’m talking about. However, one hipster’s brilliant artistic discovery eventually turned into a product available at every Urban Outfitters shop, and now that has been quite faithfully reproduced on a very tasteful camera app for Android called FXCamera (by YMST)

Without even getting into FXCamera’s smooth interface and highly customizable nature, let’s just have a look at what it does by default:

FXCamera's "Toy Camera" setting.

FXCamera's "Toy Camera" setting.

Looks pretty 1970’s doesn’t it?  You can just imagine what it would do with wood paneling or an orange shag carpet in the picture.

FXCamera's "Polaroid" setting

FXCamera's "PolaNDroid" setting

Again…more 70’s.  It’s the perfect filter if you’re growing an ironic moustache.  Unfortunately, I don’t have the patience to grow one or else I’d prove it.  I gave it an honest shot for about two weeks and I realized that it would not be ironic when it came in.  It would be the medal of perseverance for enduring weeks of people telling me to shave and girls not talking to me.  There should be a club for dudes with red or blonde hair and moustaches.  We could have meetings where we sit around looking creepy.

"Fisheye" setting in FXCamera

"Fisheye" setting in FXCamera

This is a photograph of handbags. But ideally, this would be used to shoot a photo of a skateboarder so he could say, “Holy shit, did I really ollie that high?” and you could sigh and tell him yes and that he should probably send it to Thrasher’s Photograffiti.  My friend Josh snapped a picture with a disposable camera that got in there one time, so hey…you never know.   Keep shooting for the stars, kids.

FXCamera's "Andy Warholizer"

FXCamera's "Andy Warholizer"

Here’s one that really serves no purpose.  They throw this filter onto practically every Webcam’s software, and I’ve never heard anyone go “Look at this fantastic picture of my dog rolling in shit in the style of Andy Warhol!”   Well.  I tell a lie…because that’s what this picture is.

Over the weekend, the devs added “normal” mode, which lets you pick your filter (normal, mono, sepia, negative, posterize, solarize), all the run-of-the-mill filters on your desktop photo editing freeware.  It is cool to have on your phone, though.

"Normal" mode

"Normal" mode

I think this is “Solarize.”  I never bothered to learn the difference between that and “Posterize,” because they’re both only useful if I want to look like I dropped my camera in an oil slick.

BOTTOM LINE: This is a super smooth app.  It did not crash, the interface is attractive and it’s highly customizable.  Though I don’t know how often I’ll use any of these, it’s good to know I have the option to switch to super blown out color camera mode just in case I need to snap a picture of me and Ian Svenonius or Cedric Bixler-Zavala when I run into them at the used book store.